Notes V. 1.0.0
First Version of Notes to Manuufacturing of Electronic Devices
This commit is contained in:
95
sections/pcb_testing.tex
Normal file
95
sections/pcb_testing.tex
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
|
||||
\chapter{PCB Testing}
|
||||
|
||||
The production of printed circuit boards (PCBs) is a complex manufacturing process where quality assurance is not merely a final step but an integrated philosophy. This chapter explores the diverse test technologies utilized in modern electronic production, ranging from optical and X-ray inspections to electrical and functional verifications. The core objective is to ensure that the final product meets the stringent requirements of various industries, from consumer electronics to high-reliability medical or automotive systems. The lecture transitions from the theoretical definitions of quality and quality management into the practical application of testing procedures within the production chain, emphasizing the economic necessity of identifying defects as early as possible.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Fundamental Principles of Quality Management}
|
||||
|
||||
In the context of electronic production, processes are categorized based on their contribution to the product's worth. Value-adding processes directly increase the product's value for the customer, while test processes serve to verify the quality of both the product and the preceding value-adding steps. Conversely, internal logistics and data storage are seen as non-value-adding processes.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Defining Quality in Production}
|
||||
|
||||
\dfn{Quality}{In accordance with industrial standards like DIN 55350, quality is defined as the sum of all properties and characteristics of a unit that determine its suitability to fulfill established requirements. Here, a unit can refer to any physical or non-physical object being evaluated.}
|
||||
|
||||
Understanding quality requires a shift from viewing it simply as a price-to-performance ratio to a customer-centric perspective. Modern definitions suggest that true quality is achieved when the customer returns to buy again, rather than the product returning for repairs.
|
||||
|
||||
\thm{Total Quality Management (TQM)}{Quality management has evolved from simple reactive sorting and sampling to an integrative and strategic approach known as Total Quality Management. This philosophy dictates that high-quality work must be maintained across every department, from product development through the entire value chain, to ensure long-term corporate success.}
|
||||
|
||||
\nt{Poor quality has severe economic consequences; research indicates that only a small fraction of dissatisfied customers actually complain, while the vast majority simply choose never to purchase from the company again and share their negative experiences with a wide audience.}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{The Philosophy and Goals of Testing}
|
||||
|
||||
The primary motivation for rigorous testing is the ever-increasing market demand for high-quality products and the extended responsibility companies hold over the entire lifecycle of their goods. Effective testing requires that all potential errors are characterized by specific features, allowing for a clear distinction between acceptable goods and waste.
|
||||
|
||||
\thm{The Timing of Testing}{The fundamental principle of testing in the process chain is to test as early as possible. Identifying a defect early prevents the company from continuing to invest additional manufacturing resources and components into what is essentially a piece of scrap.}
|
||||
|
||||
The goals for delivered goods are categorized by their application:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Class 1: General consumer electronics.
|
||||
\item Class 2: Industrial electronic products.
|
||||
\item Class 3: High-reliability products where failure is not an option.
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
For high-reliability electronics, the goal is often a 0 ppm (parts per million) failure rate, as even a 99.99\% success rate would result in thousands of critical errors in sectors like finance, medicine, or aviation.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Automatic Optical Inspection (AOI)}
|
||||
|
||||
Automatic Optical Inspection is a cornerstone of PCB production, utilized both after solder paste printing and after the reflow soldering process.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Definition of AOI}
|
||||
|
||||
\dfn{Automatic Optical Inspection (AOI)}{AOI is a non-destructive visual testing procedure that uses camera systems to inspect boards based on predefined criteria such as position, orientation, and patterns. It compares acquired images against a reference image to identify deviations.}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Working Principles and Illumination}
|
||||
|
||||
The effectiveness of an AOI system relies heavily on its illumination strategy. The goal is to maximize the signal contrast while minimizing noise, ensuring that critical details are clearly distinguished from the background.
|
||||
|
||||
\thm{Optical Contrast in AOI}{To achieve reliable results, the system must ensure that reflecting or transparent structures appear bright, while non-transparent or non-reflective structures remain dark, allowing the software to differentiate between various components and solder states.}
|
||||
|
||||
In solder joint inspection, a common method involves using structured light with multiple stacked circular light sources (often in Red, Green, and Blue). These lights illuminate the board from different angles. Because the inclination of the solder joint reflects different colors back to the CCD camera, the system can reconstruct the three-dimensional shape of the solder joint from a two-dimensional color image.
|
||||
|
||||
\nt{Manual visual control often follows an AOI to verify suspected errors. However, due to the high concentration required, human inspectors typically need to be rotated every two hours to maintain accuracy.}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Electrical Testing: The In-Circuit Test (ICT)}
|
||||
|
||||
While AOI focuses on the appearance of the board, the In-Circuit Test (ICT) focuses on the electrical integrity of the individual components and their connections.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Definition of ICT}
|
||||
|
||||
\dfn{In-Circuit Test (ICT)}{An electrical testing method that uses a circuit tester to measure individual components within an electronic assembly. By isolating components from the rest of the circuit using external signals, the system verifies that parts are correct and correctly connected.}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Contacting Methods}
|
||||
|
||||
Contacting is achieved by touching specific test pads on the PCB—which must be free of solder resist—with spring-loaded needles.
|
||||
|
||||
\thm{Needle Adapters vs. Flying Probes}{Traditional ICT uses expensive and complex needle adapters suitable for high-volume production. In contrast, Flying Probe testers use several independently movable fingers to contact the board, offering high flexibility for prototypes and small series without the need for custom fixtures.}
|
||||
|
||||
The ICT is particularly effective at finding interruptions, solder bridges, and faulty components. However, it cannot detect aesthetic or structural issues like air pockets in solder or slightly bent connectors that still maintain electrical contact.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Automated X-Ray Inspection (AXI)}
|
||||
|
||||
For modern assemblies with hidden solder joints, such as Ball Grid Arrays (BGAs) or components with underside terminations, optical inspection is insufficient.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Definition of AXI}
|
||||
|
||||
\dfn{Automated X-Ray Inspection (AXI)}{An inspection technique that utilizes the absorption properties of X-ray radiation to look through components. The level of absorption depends on the material's properties and the energy of the radiation, allowing the system to visualize internal structures.}
|
||||
|
||||
AXI is essential for detecting "voids" (air pockets) within solder joints and verifying the integrity of bonding wires or the hidden solder balls under a BGA.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Final Assembly and Functional Testing}
|
||||
|
||||
Once the PCB is populated and tested, it is often integrated into a housing, transforming it into a complete control unit (e.g., a motor control device).
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Software Integration and Flashing}
|
||||
|
||||
\dfn{Flashing}{The process of storing customer-specific software into the non-volatile memory (usually Flash-EEPROMs) of the control unit. This step typically occurs at the end of the value chain to allow for product variance.}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Functional and Leakage Testing}
|
||||
|
||||
The functional test evaluates the complete assembly's performance by contacting the device via its external connector. Unlike the ICT, it does not test individual paths but checks if the overall system reacts correctly to digital and analog inputs.
|
||||
|
||||
For devices intended for harsh environments, a leakage test is performed on the housing.
|
||||
|
||||
\thm{Leakage Testing Principles}{Leakage is verified by creating a pressure differential and using a tracer gas, such as Helium or Hydrogen. The system detects the concentration of gas escaping the device to determine if the seals and housing are intact.}
|
||||
|
||||
\nt{The final step in the production line is typically a final optical inspection of the completed unit, ensuring that the housing is undamaged, the connector pins are straight, and the correct customer-specific labels are perfectly aligned.}
|
||||
```
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user